How and why would you be willing to use this approach today and in service of what cause or causes?

Civil disobedience is the active, public conscientious, breach of the law to bring about change in law or public policy. Why must civil disobedience be non-violent? Why must people who engage in civil disobedience be willing to accept punishment? Write an essay in which you analyze how Thoreau “On Civil Disobedience,” Martin Luther King in, “Letter From Birmingham Jail,” and Claudia Rankine in Citizen address these questions. Make sure to describe rhetorical strategies employed by Thoreau, King, and Rankine. What persuasive writing techniques are used in their writing to convince readers of the justness of civil disobedience? Include in your essay response the extent to which you think each of their arguments is convincing. Conclude your essay with an extended discussion reflecting on the extent to which you think civil disobedience is still a valid approach to acquiring racial and social justice. How and why would you be willing to use this approach today and in service of what cause or causes? If you dont think civil disobedience is an effective strategy to use now, then conclude your essay with a discussion explaining why, and illustrate with relevant current examples that show how civil disobedience would not work today. Write a coherent essay 5-7 pages in MLA format.