HITCH and Meaningful Use—A Real-World Debate
Though electronic health records (E Hrs) may provide an abundance of information at faster speeds than paper-based records ever could, the cost and challenges related to implementation have prevented many organizations from adopting E Hrs. The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITCH) Act aims to increase the adoption rate by providing financial incentives for health care organizations that demonstrate “ meaningful use” of E Hrs. In order to receive these funds, settings must meet a specific set of requirements identified by the HITCH legislation.
The adoption of an HER can often be a frenzied process because of the incentives provided by the HITCH Act. In addition, the saturation of the technology market provides settings with an overwhelming amount of options from which to choose.
In this Discussion, you debate the effectiveness of the HITCH Act and Meaningful Use mandates.
Consider the ways HITCH and Meaningful Use mandates have impacted a health care setting with which you are familiar.
Conduct research in the Walden Library and through credible nursing organizations to assess how the nursing bioinformatics community is addressing these mandates.
Create a list that documents the pros and cons that mandates such as these have on health care settings. Reflect upon your list, and determine whether you believe these mandates are beneficial or harmful to health care organizations and nursing practice.
Post tomorrow 6/27/2016 550 words in SPA format with a minimum of 3 references
1) A brief scholarly commentary that describes your stance on issues related to HITCH and meaningful use.
2) Include in your commentary your personal beliefs on the issue, your experiences in a health care organization, and/or the pros and cons surrounding these initiatives.
3)Select at least one of the following to underscore your stance:
Mandating change. Do the HITCH Act and Meaningful Use mandates help to drive and equalize change across all health care settings, or do they lead to rapid and sloppy implementations?
The benefits or ramifications that stem from the use of incentives and disincentives.
The influence of across-the-board mandates on patient safety, ethics, and quality of care.
The allocation of funds specifically earmarked for HITCH and Meaningful Use. Is it worth it or wasted?