Provide a critical evaluation on that research through an annotated bibliography.

An annotated bibliography is a brief summary and analysis of the journal article reviewed. For more information on annotated bibliographies please visit Purdue?s OWL:

A total of four annotated bibliographies are to be submitted (not to exceed one page each). The articles must come from nursing scholarly literature and may not be older than 5 years since publication. Please Web pages, magazines, textbooks, and other books are not acceptable.
1- Hallberg, I., Ranerup, A., & Kjellgren, K. (2015). Supporting the self-management of hypertension: Patients? experiences of using a mobile phone-based system. Journal of Human Hypertension, doi:10.1038/jhh.2015.37
2- Lee, P. Y., Liew, S. M., Abdullah, A., Abdullah, N., Ng, C. J., Hanafi, N. S., . . . Khoo, E. M. (2015). Healthcare professionals’ and policy makers’ views on implementing a clinical practice guideline of hypertension management: A qualitative study: E0126191. PLoS One,10(5) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126191
3- Flynn, S. J., Ameling, J. M., Hill-Briggs, F., Wolff, J. L., Bone, L. R., Levine, D. M., . . . Boulware, L. E. (2013). Facilitators and barriers to hypertension self-management in urban african americans: Perspectives of patients and family members. Patient Preference and Adherence, 7, 741. doi:10.2147/PPA.S46517
4- Chen, S., Tsai, J., & Chou, K. (2011). Illness perceptions and adherence to therapeutic regimens among patients with hypertension: A structural modeling approach. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(2), 235-245. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.07.005
Each annotation must address the following critical elements:
? Explanation of the main purpose and scope of the cited work
? Brief description of the research conducted
? Value and significance of the work (e.g., study?s findings, scope of the research project) as a contribution to the subject under consideration
? Possible shortcomings or bias in the work
? Conclusions or observations reached by the author
? Summary as to why this research lends evidence to support the potential problem identified specific to your role specialization

Assignment 2 Grading Criteria Maximum Points
Articles selected are appropriate to role option and support the potential problem identified. 20
Addresses required elements for each of the 4 nursing research articles that provide supportive evidence for the problem. 40
Articles selected meet guidelines (qualitative methodology, nursing scholarly literature, no older than 5 years since publication). 30
Followed APA guidelines for writing style, format, spelling, and grammar. 10
Total: 100